A 0-to-1 product exploring whether AI-enhanced delivery can bring a proven entrepreneurship methodology to people underserved by traditional accelerators and VCs.
I own this end-to-end: strategy, research, prototyping, and day-to-day execution, with support from a user researcher and Claude Code as my primary working tool.
What I'm Doing
The project started stalled and ambiguous: no clear direction, no owner, multiple stakeholders waiting. I took it from there to active market validation in under 5 months.
- Led strategic research combining primary data, landscape analysis, and partner methodology analysis (three sources that pointed in different directions)
- Synthesized conflicting data into a phased strategy that got executive buy-in
- Designed an AI behavior framework that defined not just what the AI should do, but what it explicitly should not
- Built and iterated prototypes, testing with real users to surface insights design reviews would have missed
- Currently managing parallel workstreams across user research, market testing, pilot programs, and external partnerships
Skills Demonstrated
- Strategic research: turning ambiguity into a recommendation with evidence
- Synthesis under conflict: making sense of data that disagrees
- AI product design: defining AI behavior, boundaries, and interaction models
- Rapid prototyping: 6 iterations in a day using Claude Code
- Stakeholder alignment: achieving buy-in without formal authority
- Solo execution: owning strategy through delivery as the only full-time PM
Partnering with the operations team on how the organization adopts AI. My role is strategy and modeling. I run Claude Code daily across real product work, then translate what I learn into training, playbooks, and demos that help others adopt with confidence. I facilitated the team's first AI upskilling workshop and demonstrated the full PM architecture to leadership, which opened broader conversations about adoption across the org.
I noticed our team was spending months on deep research before any user contact, an R&D pattern that doesn't fit product development. So I drafted a four-phase innovation loop (Sense, Shape, Test, Scale) with time-boxed cycles and explicit go/pivot/kill criteria. I'm testing it on my own project first and have presented it to leadership as a proposal. Still early.